h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
H1000 is on my desire list of powders in addition. It's possible the IMR Enduron collection will be nicely liked and I can move to that for much better availability.
They've carried out identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to obtain the newer SC Model but have now switched back again. Preferably you desire about 100% loading density. Should you have enough situation potential for that H4831(prolonged) you happen to be likely superior off.
What's the primary difference? Compression. With no extreme/significant compression affiliated with the extended grain 7828, the strain curve was altered plus the load fell apart.
Warning making use of SC or SSC produced loads with prolonged Minimize, back again off and operate up. Use Safe and sound loading tactics.
Yup or it will never get the job done properly. And Because the OP features a load using Varget I'd check out to search out an individual to trade with. May well think of a acquire get problem.
Considering the fact that there doesn't appear to be any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you supply a place to begin with this mixture and things to consider when working this Load up?
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the sole genuine change is that the shortcut meters improved as a result of reloading products. After it's loaded theres no purposeful distinction. I have read that the shortcut could possibly have a very small bit more rapidly melt away price but It appears insignificant.
excaliber stated: I have found the precise opposite to generally be real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Win Mag.
Any load data to h4831sc guidance that? My to start with thought is it isn't gonna burn off all of the way and velocities is going to be sluggish and in every single place. Is likely to be a good fireworks display!
Why would I point out this? Precisely what is my place? I'm unsure that there's a genuine legitimate point aside from what exactly is preferred with most has not been well known with me whatsoever in these conditions. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or one thing? Only to show you how nuts I h4831sc load data actually am, tomorrow I'm range testing a close friends new .
That is an older thread, you may not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an previous thread. Make sure you contemplate creating a new thread.
Yes, You need to use h4831 vs h4831sc a similar load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, nevertheless the SC Model may enable you to get a tiny bit much more in conditions in which you are maxing out circumstance volume With all the typical powder before reaching stress limitations.
Can I assume that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the physical variance but will it influence the burn or velocity? I feel not but I'm not one hundred% absolutely sure.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with lower to min costs. I’m conversing 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain charge in a very Norma case. Not what I had been searching for, but exact Nevertheless.